Juvenile Justice Process and Corrections Essay

The following research exit discuss the teen butt ashes. Starting with the intake military operation it pass on discuss each amount of the process and the options the defendant will be given. There are concerns and current weaknesses the process has where it whitethorn give opportunity of unlawful and in nominal dialog may be occurring. It will also further discuss the considered factors that will determine the recents sentence. A recent example of the youthful process is the representative of the victim Michael Brewer, which was set on fire by five other teenagers in 2009 over a 40 one dollar bill video game debt. Three out of the five accused were waived to braggy philander awaiting a criminal trial. Matthew Bent who initiated the burning of Michael Brewer communicate a new trial on the grounds of jury misconduct. On October 2012 Deerfield Beach judge denied the request for insufficient evidence. In this particular case the accused crime were considered severe and were waived to adult court where they are little concerned in rehabilitation and much concerned in sentencing a proper punishment for their crimes.The victim was ignited using rubbing alcoholic beverageic beverage and has suffered severe psychological impact from the even. According to Sun-Sentinel (2012) He remembered the cool whole tone of rubbing alcohol splashing on him. He remembered the burning sensation, the urge to run and jump into the pool. He remembered wanting to stay in the peeing and seeing the first results of the horrific attack hed on the button endured. Matthew Bent is suspected to attacking Michael Brewer for several reasons such as, forcing the victim to purchase an item, snitching, and attempting to steal Michael Brewers fathers bicycle. Denver Jarvis an accomplice to the crime pored rubbing alcohol on Michael Brewer. On October 13, 2009 all the suspects were taken in to custody. On November 10, 2009 the major(ip) role players of the crime are charged as a dults with second academic degree murder.Bent attorney tried to have the case waivered back to the young system except it was declined. Intake officers screen juvenile cases to determine which should be prosecuted or sent to diversion programs. Intake is a screening that will determine if juvenile should be released, given a future court hearing, diversion programs, prosecution, or waiver to adult criminal court. Intake officers reach and create a social record of the accused and discuss options with the juveniles parents or guardian (Champion, 2010). The intake process is informal tour an attorney can be present it is not really infallible since the purpose of the procedure is to determine other attention the child may need other than the juvenile court system. Cases where the juvenile is released to their parents or cases dropped essential be approved by the juvenile prosecutor.The release to a juvenile to parents or guardian may encompass terms and conditions that they sho uld follow. This is a formal binding contract in which cases the contract is broken by any the juvenile or the parents the court has the right to continue with other retaliatory actions. Legal factors must be taken in to consideration former to make these decisions. It is important to understand that each jurisdiction differ in their intake process. A growing concern during the intake process is that more defense attorneys have been attending this process and conversations that are similar to invocation bargains are occurring with the intake officer.The outcome of the sentencing is determined by several different factors such as, seriousness, type of crime, age, and criminal record, evidence for and against the defendant. Many believe in that respect are too many juvenile incarcerations occurring the public mandates to rehabilitate the juveniles, however little enfaces and importance is given to the type of funding the program needs. In conclusion, the juvenile justice system has a very similar process system except for the primary objective. The primary objective is to rehabilitate, whereas criminal courts do not focus on rehabilitating. Diversion programs and waivers are great options to regulate the ideal punishment for particular crimes. Juveniles have more options as to how to wait on their sentence unless they are waivered in to criminal court.ReferencesChampion, D. J. (2010). The juvenile justice system Delinquency, processing, and the law. (6thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson/Prentice Hall.The Burning of Michael Brewer. (2012). Retrieved fromhttp//www.sun-sentinel.com/news/broward/michaelbrewer/