Illegalization of Flag Burning Violates the First Constitutional Amendment :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

Illegalization of Flag Burning Violates the First entire AmendmentWhen making keel displaceing illegal you have to wonder what our lawmakers were thinking. It was all the way not about(predicate) the First Amendment in which Americans honorable to lighten speech is protected. Desecrating a sign is guaranteed in our Bill of Rights, all the same unpatriotic that may be. It is impossible to draw the line of where desecration begins. What about those that let our sacred symbol touch the ground, a clear usurpation of respect, do we punish them too? This proposed law is un-American and will scarce lead to furious citizens exercising their born rights. In two hundred0, a gladiolus protection amendment was proposed, the statue contained harsh penalties, with fines up to 250, 000 dollars and two years jail fourth dimension requested. Amendment remove lightendom was defeated in the senate by a 36 to 64 vote, 64 people were looking out for our freedom. Laws like this would leave behind Congress to engage in thought control. Allowing a flag burning amendment to pass is letting Congress chance what is acceptable considering free speech. Surely this law will provoke more than it will help. It is believed, on average, that seven flags are burned a year, and in fact prof Robert Justin Goldtein documented that only 45 flags were burned in the past 200 years. Seven will multiply if Americans think their rights are being curtailed. During Prohibition, a time when alcohol consumption was outlawed, nearly 30, 000 illegal and secret saloons were started in New York City. This shows that when rights are taken away Americans wont stop, flag burning wont cease either with an amendment.Boy Scouts burn flags when retiring them. How can a flag burning law determine just were to draw the desecration line? The amendment would have to detailed guidelines that penalise only the protesters. Burning a flag would only become a crime when the thoughts attached to the act are off ensive or forefathers believed free speech to be one of our most necessary rights.